Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Sultai Beanstalk | __bmj__ | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Jeskai Control | gamer811 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Jeskai Control | spyromancer | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
ignotus97 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 | |
Dimir Control | crystalpalacefc | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
4 Color Beanstalk , 4 Color Legends , 4 Color Omniscience , Azorius Control , Azorius Flash , Azorius Omniscience , Azorius Tokens Control , Bant Beanstalk , Bant Control
Jace, the Perfected Mind ranks #277 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 82%).
Blue average: 58.7%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Jace, the Perfected Mind is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 7.90 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 4 mana, the average win rate in the format is 68.6%. Jace, the Perfected Mind has a win rate of 66.0%, making it 3.7% worse than other 4-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Get Out | Instant | 7 | 70.0% | 2 |
Disfigure | Instant | 13 | 67.0% | 1 |
Soul-Guide Lantern | Artifact | 32 | 65.3% | 11 |
Joust Through | Instant | 5 | 63.3% | 1 |
Chrome Host Seedshark | Creature — Phyrexian Shark | 27 | 61.7% | 6 |
Blot Out | Instant | 58 | 60.3% | 11 |
Preacher of the Schism | Creature — Vampire Cleric | 79 | 59.2% | 16 |
Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 182 | 58.9% | 45 |
Dreams of Steel and Oil | Sorcery | 79 | 58.6% | 15 |
Fear of Isolation | Enchantment Creature — Nightmare | 6 | 58.2% | 0 |
Cards that perform better with Jace, the Perfected Mind than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oildeep Gearhulk | Artifact Creature — Construct | 4 | 5 | 78.6% | 66.7% | +11.8% |
Go for the Throat | Instant | 2 | 9 | 76.3% | 67.2% | +9.1% |
Malicious Eclipse | Sorcery | 3 | 5 | 75.0% | 66.8% | +8.2% |
Torch the Tower | Instant | 1 | 5 | 76.9% | 68.9% | +8.0% |
Preacher of the Schism | Creature — Vampire Cleric | 3 | 5 | 75.0% | 67.6% | +7.4% |
Mazemind Tome | Artifact | 2 | 5 | 73.9% | 67.4% | +6.5% |
Abrade | Instant | 2 | 9 | 80.0% | 73.7% | +6.3% |
Authority of the Consuls | Enchantment | 1 | 14 | 73.2% | 67.8% | +5.4% |
Split Up | Sorcery | 3 | 7 | 74.3% | 69.1% | +5.2% |
Doomsday Excruciator | Creature — Demon | 6 | 5 | 75.0% | 70.5% | +4.5% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Azorius Control | 321 | 87.7% | 50.3% |
Domain Zur Overlords | 187 | 14.3% | 45.1% |
Mono White Tokens | 96 | 15.8% | 41.9% |
Dimir Demons | 88 | 86.3% | 47.1% |
Dimir Control | 71 | 97.3% | 53.2% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.